Miller-El v. Dretke
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Miller-El_v._Dretke an entity of type: Thing
Miller-El v. Dretke, 545 U.S. 231 (2005), is a United States Supreme Court case that clarified the constitutional limitations on the use by prosecutors of peremptory challenges and of the Texas procedure appropriately termed the "jury shuffle."
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Miller-El v. Dretke
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Miller-El v. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Divisions
xsd:integer
3091241
xsd:integer
1072136723
rdf:langString
Thomas
rdf:langString
Rehnquist, Scalia
rdf:langString
Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer
<second>
172800.0
<second>
25920.0
xsd:integer
231
xsd:integer
545
xsd:gMonthDay
--12-06
xsd:integer
2004
rdf:langString
Miller-El v. Dretke,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-13
xsd:integer
2005
rdf:langString
Miller-El v. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Divisions
rdf:langString
The prosecution in the capital trial of Miller-El violated the Fourteenth Amendment as interpreted in Batson v. Kentucky when it racially discriminated against black potential jurors, and Miller-El is entitled to habeas corpus relief.
rdf:langString
Miller-El v. Dretke
rdf:langString
Souter
rdf:langString
Miller-El v. Dretke, 545 U.S. 231 (2005), is a United States Supreme Court case that clarified the constitutional limitations on the use by prosecutors of peremptory challenges and of the Texas procedure appropriately termed the "jury shuffle."
rdf:langString
Breyer
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
3900