McWilliams v. Dunn
http://dbpedia.org/resource/McWilliams_v._Dunn an entity of type: Thing
McWilliams v. Dunn, 582 U.S. __ (2017), is a United States Supreme Court ruling that clarified Ake v. Oklahoma in relation to the case of convicted murderer, rapist and robber James E. McWilliams. The Court ruled 5–4 in favour of Williams on the grounds of the defendant not having access to an independent mental health expert during his trial with the lower appellate court not considering this in the previous appeal, as written in the opinion authored by Justice Breyer.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
McWilliams v. Dunn
rdf:langString
James E. McWilliams v. Jefferson S. Dunn, Commissioner,Alabama Dept. of Corrections, et al.
xsd:integer
66301525
xsd:integer
1063660308
rdf:langString
Alito
xsd:integer
16
rdf:langString
Roberts, Thomas, Gorsuch
rdf:langString
Kennedy, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Kagan
rdf:langString
__
xsd:integer
582
xsd:gMonthDay
--04-24
xsd:integer
2017
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-19
xsd:integer
2017
rdf:langString
James E. McWilliams v. Jefferson S. Dunn, Commissioner, Alabama Dept. of Corrections, et al.
rdf:langString
McWilliams v. Dunn
rdf:langString
Breyer
rdf:langString
McWilliams v. Dunn, 582 U.S. __ (2017), is a United States Supreme Court ruling that clarified Ake v. Oklahoma in relation to the case of convicted murderer, rapist and robber James E. McWilliams. The Court ruled 5–4 in favour of Williams on the grounds of the defendant not having access to an independent mental health expert during his trial with the lower appellate court not considering this in the previous appeal, as written in the opinion authored by Justice Breyer.
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
2341