McKaskle v. Wiggins
http://dbpedia.org/resource/McKaskle_v._Wiggins an entity of type: Thing
McKaskle v. Wiggins, 465 U.S. 168 (1984), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the court considered the role of standby counsel in a criminal trial where the defendant conducted his own defense (pro se). In this case the defendant claimed his Sixth Amendment right to present his own case in a criminal trial was violated by the presence of a court-appointed standby counsel.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
McKaskle v. Wiggins
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
McKaskle, Acting Director, Texas Department of Corrections v. Carl Edwin Wiggins
xsd:integer
16644061
xsd:integer
1073090073
rdf:langString
White
rdf:langString
Brennan, Marshall
rdf:langString
Burger, Powell, Rehnquist, Blackmun, Stevens
<second>
172800.0
rdf:langString
Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
xsd:integer
168
xsd:integer
465
xsd:gMonthDay
--11-09
xsd:integer
1983
rdf:langString
McKaskle v. Wiggins,
xsd:gMonthDay
--01-24
xsd:integer
1984
rdf:langString
McKaskle, Acting Director, Texas Department of Corrections v. Carl Edwin Wiggins
rdf:langString
Respondent's Sixth Amendment right to self-representation was not violated by the presence of a court-appointed standby counsel.
rdf:langString
McKaskle v. Wiggins
rdf:langString
O'Connor
rdf:langString
McKaskle v. Wiggins, 465 U.S. 168 (1984), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the court considered the role of standby counsel in a criminal trial where the defendant conducted his own defense (pro se). In this case the defendant claimed his Sixth Amendment right to present his own case in a criminal trial was violated by the presence of a court-appointed standby counsel.
rdf:langString
Blackmun
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
6425