Marsh v. Alabama
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Marsh_v._Alabama an entity of type: Thing
Marsh v. Alabama, 326 U.S. 501 (1946), was a case decided by the US Supreme Court, which ruled that a state trespassing statute could not be used to prevent the distribution of religious materials on a town's sidewalk even though the sidewalk was part of a privately-owned company town. The Court based its ruling on the provisions of the First Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Marsh v. Alabama
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Marsh v. State of Alabama
xsd:integer
4849581
xsd:integer
1118563581
rdf:langString
Reversed and Remanded
rdf:langString
Reed
rdf:langString
Stone, Burton
rdf:langString
Douglas, Murphy, Rutledge; Frankfurter
xsd:integer
66
rdf:langString
Defendant found guilty in Alabama Circuit Court; Alabama Court of Appeals affirmed; Alabama Supreme Court denied certiorari
xsd:integer
501
xsd:integer
326
xsd:gMonthDay
--12-07
xsd:integer
1945
rdf:langString
Marsh v. Alabama,
xsd:gMonthDay
--01-07
xsd:integer
1946
rdf:langString
Marsh v. State of Alabama
rdf:langString
Constitutional protections of free speech under First and Fourteenth Amendments still apply within the confines of a town owned by a private entity.
rdf:langString
Marsh v. Alabama
rdf:langString
Black
rdf:langString
Marsh v. Alabama, 326 U.S. 501 (1946), was a case decided by the US Supreme Court, which ruled that a state trespassing statute could not be used to prevent the distribution of religious materials on a town's sidewalk even though the sidewalk was part of a privately-owned company town. The Court based its ruling on the provisions of the First Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment.
rdf:langString
Frankfurter
rdf:langString
Jackson
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
9967