Lux v. Haggin
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Lux_v._Haggin an entity of type: Abstraction100002137
Lux v. Haggin, 69 Cal. 255; 10 P. 674; (1886), is a historic case in the conflict between riparian and appropriative water rights. Decided by a vote of four to three in the Supreme Court of California, the ruling held that appropriative rights were secondary to riparian rights.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Lux v. Haggin
xsd:integer
35204151
xsd:integer
1053598161
rdf:langString
Ross
rdf:langString
Myrick
rdf:langString
Morrison
rdf:langString
; 10 P. 674
xsd:gMonthDay
--04-26
xsd:integer
1886
rdf:langString
Charles Lux et al., Appellants, v. James B. Haggin et al. The Kern River Land and Canal Company, Respondent
rdf:langString
Riparian water rights are superior to appropriative water rights. Appropriation of water for public use is permitted with just compensation.
rdf:langString
Lux v. Haggin
rdf:langString
McKinstry
rdf:langString
Lux v. Haggin, 69 Cal. 255; 10 P. 674; (1886), is a historic case in the conflict between riparian and appropriative water rights. Decided by a vote of four to three in the Supreme Court of California, the ruling held that appropriative rights were secondary to riparian rights.
rdf:langString
Elisha W. McKinstry, Samuel B. McKee, John R. Sharpstein, James D. Thornton, Erskine M. Ross, Milton H. Myrick
rdf:langString
McKee, Sharpstein, Thornton
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
9897