Liversidge v Anderson
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Liversidge_v_Anderson an entity of type: SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
Liversidge v Anderson [1941] UKHL 1 is a landmark United Kingdom administrative law case which concerned the relationship between the courts and the state, and in particular the assistance that the judiciary should give to the executive in times of national emergency. It concerns civil liberties and the separation of powers. Both the majority and dissenting judgments in the case have been cited as persuasive precedent by various countries of the Commonwealth of Nations. However, in England itself, the courts have gradually retreated from the decision in Liversidge. It has been described as "an example of extreme judicial deference to executive decision-making, best explained by the context of wartime, and it has no authority today." It is therefore mainly notable in England for the dissent
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Liversidge v Anderson
rdf:langString
Liversidge v Anderson
xsd:integer
7561447
xsd:integer
1121460392
rdf:langString
[1941] UKHL 1, [1942] AC 206
rdf:langString
March 2019
rdf:langString
Judicial review, detention
rdf:langString
Does not explain the purpose for which the Liversidge decision was cited, or any attitudes expressed about the majority and dissenting reasons
rdf:langString
Liversidge v Anderson [1941] UKHL 1 is a landmark United Kingdom administrative law case which concerned the relationship between the courts and the state, and in particular the assistance that the judiciary should give to the executive in times of national emergency. It concerns civil liberties and the separation of powers. Both the majority and dissenting judgments in the case have been cited as persuasive precedent by various countries of the Commonwealth of Nations. However, in England itself, the courts have gradually retreated from the decision in Liversidge. It has been described as "an example of extreme judicial deference to executive decision-making, best explained by the context of wartime, and it has no authority today." It is therefore mainly notable in England for the dissent of Lord Atkin.
xsd:date
1941-11-03
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
19695
