Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Koontz_v._St._Johns_River_Water_Management_District an entity of type: Thing
Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District, 570 U.S. 595 (2013), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that land-use agencies imposing conditions on the issuance of development permits must comply with the "nexus" and "rough proportionality" standards of Nollan v. California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. City of Tigard, even if the condition consists of a requirement to pay money, and even if the permit is denied for failure to agree to the condition. It was the first case in which monetary exactions were found to be unconstitutional conditions.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Coy A. Koontz, Jr., Petitioner v. St. Johns River Water Management District.
xsd:integer
40171513
xsd:integer
1024217548
rdf:langString
Kagan
rdf:langString
Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor
rdf:langString
Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas
<second>
172800.0
<second>
259200.0
xsd:integer
595
xsd:integer
570
xsd:gMonthDay
--01-15
xsd:integer
2013
rdf:langString
Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-25
xsd:integer
2013
rdf:langString
Coy A. Koontz, Jr., Petitioner v. St. Johns River Water Management District.
rdf:langString
When a discretionary land-use permit is denied because the applicant declines to pay for improvements to other, unrelated property, a challenge to the constitutionality of the denial must be evaluated under the "essential nexus" standard of Nollan v. California Coastal Commission and the "rough proportionality" requirement of Dolan v. City of Tigard.
rdf:langString
Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District
rdf:langString
Alito
rdf:langString
Supreme Court
rdf:langString
Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District, 570 U.S. 595 (2013), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that land-use agencies imposing conditions on the issuance of development permits must comply with the "nexus" and "rough proportionality" standards of Nollan v. California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. City of Tigard, even if the condition consists of a requirement to pay money, and even if the permit is denied for failure to agree to the condition. It was the first case in which monetary exactions were found to be unconstitutional conditions.
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
12971