Klayman v. Obama
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Klayman_v._Obama an entity of type: WikicatUnitedStatesDistrictCourtCases
Klayman v. Obama, 957 F.Supp.2d 1 (D.D.C., 2013), was a decision by the United States District Court for District of Columbia finding that the National Security Agency's (NSA) bulk phone metadata collection program was unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment. The ruling was later overturned on jurisdictional grounds, leaving the constitutional implications of NSA surveillance unaddressed.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Klayman v. Obama
rdf:langString
Klayman v. Obama
xsd:integer
41799295
xsd:integer
1124616754
rdf:langString
Warrantless telecommunications surveillance is not permitted under the Fourth Amendment.
xsd:integer
150
rdf:langString
Klayman v. Obama, 957 F.Supp.2d 1 (D.D.C., 2013), was a decision by the United States District Court for District of Columbia finding that the National Security Agency's (NSA) bulk phone metadata collection program was unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment. The ruling was later overturned on jurisdictional grounds, leaving the constitutional implications of NSA surveillance unaddressed.
xsd:date
2013-12-16
rdf:langString
Klayman I: Verizon Communications, President Barack Obama, NSA director , Attorney General Eric Holder, Jr., US District Judge Roger Vinson; Klayman II: Facebook, Yahoo!, Google, Microsoft, YouTube, AOL, PalTalk, Skype, Sprint, AT&T, Apple and the same government defendants as in Klayman I
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
18657