King v. Smith
http://dbpedia.org/resource/King_v._Smith an entity of type: Thing
King v. Smith, 392 U.S. 309 (1968), was a decision in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) could not be withheld because of the presence of a "substitute father" who visited a family on weekends. The issue before the US Supreme Court involved how the states could determine how to implement a federal program. The court used the term "co-operative federalism."
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
King v. Smith
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
King, Commissioner, Department of Pensions and Security, et al. v. Smith et al.
xsd:integer
9431376
xsd:integer
895899356
rdf:langString
Black, Harlan II., Brennan, Stewart, White, Fortas, Marshall
<second>
172800.0
xsd:integer
309
xsd:integer
392
xsd:gMonthDay
--04-23
xsd:integer
1968
rdf:langString
King v. Smith,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-17
xsd:integer
1968
rdf:langString
King, Commissioner, Department of Pensions and Security, et al. v. Smith et al.
rdf:langString
Aid to Families with Dependent Children cannot be denied to families of qualifying children based on a substitute father.
rdf:langString
King v. Smith
rdf:langString
Warren
rdf:langString
King v. Smith, 392 U.S. 309 (1968), was a decision in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) could not be withheld because of the presence of a "substitute father" who visited a family on weekends. The issue before the US Supreme Court involved how the states could determine how to implement a federal program. The court used the term "co-operative federalism."
rdf:langString
Douglas
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
2757