King v. Burwell
http://dbpedia.org/resource/King_v._Burwell an entity of type: Thing
King v. Burwell, 576 U.S. 473 (2015), was a 6–3 decision by the Supreme Court of the United States interpreting provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA). The Court's decision upheld, as consistent with the statute, the outlay of premium tax credits to qualifying persons in all states, both those with exchanges established directly by a state, and those otherwise established by the Department of Health and Human Services.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
King v. Burwell
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
David King, et al., Petitioners v.Sylvia Burwell, Secretary ofHealth and Human Services, et al.
rdf:langString
King v. Burwell
rdf:langString
Halbig v. Burwell
xsd:integer
43303883
xsd:integer
1108762492
rdf:langString
Rehearing en banc ordered .
rdf:langString
Scalia
xsd:integer
14
rdf:langString
Thomas, Alito
rdf:langString
Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan
<second>
172800.0
<second>
25920.0
xsd:integer
988
xsd:integer
576
xsd:gMonthDay
--03-04
xsd:date
2014-03-25
xsd:date
2014-05-14
xsd:integer
2015
rdf:langString
No. 14-5018
rdf:langString
King v. Burwell,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-25
xsd:integer
2015
rdf:langString
David King, et al., Petitioners v. Sylvia Burwell, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al.
rdf:langString
Section 36B of the ACA provides for subsidies under both federally run and state-run exchanges. The wording "...established by the State" was superfluous when read within "the broader structure of the Act".
xsd:integer
150
rdf:langString
Harry T. Edwards
rdf:langString
Andre M. Davis
rdf:langString
A. Raymond Randolph,
rdf:langString
Roger Gregory,
rdf:langString
King v. Burwell
rdf:langString
Roberts
rdf:langString
Supreme Court
rdf:langString
King v. Burwell, 576 U.S. 473 (2015), was a 6–3 decision by the Supreme Court of the United States interpreting provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA). The Court's decision upheld, as consistent with the statute, the outlay of premium tax credits to qualifying persons in all states, both those with exchanges established directly by a state, and those otherwise established by the Department of Health and Human Services. The petitioners had argued that the plain language of the statute provided eligibility for tax credits only to those persons in states with state-operated exchanges. The Court found the plaintiffs' interpretation to be "the most natural reading of the pertinent statutory phrase." Nevertheless, the Court found the statute as a whole to be ambiguous, and that "the pertinent statutory phrase" ought to be interpreted in a manner "that is compatible with the rest of the law." The majority opinion stated: "Congress made the guaranteed issue and community rating requirements applicable in every State in the Nation. But those requirements only work when combined with the coverage requirement and tax credits. So it stands to reason that Congress meant for those provisions to apply in every State as well."
xsd:date
2014-07-22
rdf:langString
The IRS does not have the statutory power to grant subsidies to Federally-established insurance marketplaces known as exchanges established under the Affordable Care Act, as the enabling legislation defines exchanges as being established by states themselves. Reversed and remanded with instructions to grant summary judgment to the appellants and to vacate the IRS rule, 2–1. Opinion by Judge Griffith, concurrence by Judge Randolph. Judge Edwards dissents.
rdf:langString
The plaintiffs contend that the IRS’s interpretation is contrary to the language of the statute, which, they assert, authorizes tax credits only for individuals who purchase insurance on state-run Exchanges. For reasons explained below, we find that the applicable statutory language is ambiguous and subject to multiple interpretations. Applying deference to the IRS’s determination, however, we uphold the rule as a permissible exercise of the agency’s discretion.
rdf:langString
Summary judgment for government defendants, 2014 WL 129023
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
58073