J Spurling Ltd v Bradshaw

http://dbpedia.org/resource/J_Spurling_Ltd_v_Bradshaw an entity of type: Agent

J Spurling Ltd v Bradshaw [1956] EWCA Civ 3 is an English contract law and English property law case on exclusion clauses and bailment. It is best known for Denning LJ's "red hand rule" comment, where he said, I quite agree that the more unreasonable a clause is, the greater the notice which must be given of it. Some clauses which I have seen would need to be printed in red ink on the face of the document with a red hand pointing to it before the notice could be held to be sufficient. rdf:langString
rdf:langString J Spurling Ltd v Bradshaw
rdf:langString J Spurling Ltd v Bradshaw
xsd:integer 20599213
xsd:integer 1088507333
rdf:langString [1956] 1 Lloyd's Rep 392
rdf:langString [1956] 1 WLR 461
rdf:langString [1956] 2 All ER 121
rdf:langString [1956] EWCA Civ 3
rdf:langString J Spurling Ltd v Bradshaw [1956] EWCA Civ 3 is an English contract law and English property law case on exclusion clauses and bailment. It is best known for Denning LJ's "red hand rule" comment, where he said, I quite agree that the more unreasonable a clause is, the greater the notice which must be given of it. Some clauses which I have seen would need to be printed in red ink on the face of the document with a red hand pointing to it before the notice could be held to be sufficient.
xsd:date 1956-03-26
xsd:nonNegativeInteger 9912

data from the linked data cloud