Humphrey's Executor v. United States
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Humphrey's_Executor_v._United_States an entity of type: Thing
Humphrey's Executor v. United States, 295 U.S. 602 (1935), was a Supreme Court of the United States case decided regarding whether the United States President has the power to remove executive officials of a quasi-legislative or quasi-judicial administrative body for reasons other than what is allowed by Congress. The Court held that the President did not have this power. However, Humphrey's has been distinguished by Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. In Seila, Chief Justice John Roberts described Humphrey's as holding that Congress may occasionally create independent agencies with removal only for cause if such agencies share the characteristics of the FTC in 1935.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Humphrey's Executor v. United States
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Humphrey's Executor v. United States
rdf:langString
Rathbun, Executor v. United States
xsd:integer
9734392
xsd:integer
1075088609
rdf:langString
unanimous
rdf:langString
U.S. Const. art. I; U.S. Const. art. II; Federal Trade Commission Act
xsd:integer
55
xsd:integer
602
xsd:integer
295
xsd:gMonthDay
--05-01
xsd:integer
1935
rdf:langString
Humphrey's Executor v. United States,
xsd:gMonthDay
--05-27
xsd:integer
1935
rdf:langString
Humphrey's Executor v. United States
rdf:langString
Rathbun, Executor v. United States
rdf:langString
The President may not remove any appointee to an independent regulatory agency except for reasons that Congress has provided by law.
rdf:langString
Humphrey's Executor v. United States
rdf:langString
Sutherland
rdf:langString
Humphrey's Executor v. United States, 295 U.S. 602 (1935), was a Supreme Court of the United States case decided regarding whether the United States President has the power to remove executive officials of a quasi-legislative or quasi-judicial administrative body for reasons other than what is allowed by Congress. The Court held that the President did not have this power. However, Humphrey's has been distinguished by Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. In Seila, Chief Justice John Roberts described Humphrey's as holding that Congress may occasionally create independent agencies with removal only for cause if such agencies share the characteristics of the FTC in 1935.
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
8310
