Hilton v. Guyot
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Hilton_v._Guyot an entity of type: Thing
Hilton v. Guyot, 159 U.S. 113 (1895), was a United States Supreme Court case where the Court ruled that the recognition and enforceability of a foreign judgment rested on the "comity of nations," namely whether there would be any reciprocity and mutual recognition by the foreign jurisdiction from which the judgment was issued.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Hilton v. Guyot
rdf:langString
Henry Hilton v. Gustave Bertin Guyot, et al.
xsd:integer
11121940
xsd:integer
1116361869
rdf:langString
Fuller
rdf:langString
Harlan, Brewer, Jackson
rdf:langString
Field, Brown, Shiras, White
xsd:integer
16
xsd:integer
113
xsd:integer
159
xsd:gMonthDay
--04-10
xsd:integer
1894
rdf:langString
Hilton v. Guyot,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-03
xsd:integer
1895
rdf:langString
Henry Hilton v. Gustave Bertin Guyot, et al.
rdf:langString
The enforcement of a foreign judgment rests on whether there is comity with the jurisdiction from which it is issued, based on criteria articulated by the Court.
rdf:langString
Hilton v. Guyot
rdf:langString
Gray
rdf:langString
Hilton v. Guyot, 159 U.S. 113 (1895), was a United States Supreme Court case where the Court ruled that the recognition and enforceability of a foreign judgment rested on the "comity of nations," namely whether there would be any reciprocity and mutual recognition by the foreign jurisdiction from which the judgment was issued. Hilton established the fundamental basis for the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in the United States, remaining "the most detailed exposition of any American court" on this principle. It is also viewed as the quintessential statement of comity in international law, and is one of the earliest decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court to assert that international law is part of U.S. law.
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
7975
