Hills v. Gautreaux

rdf:langString Hills v. Gautreaux

rdf:langString

rdf:langString Hills, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development v Gautreaux et al.

rdf:langString Burger, Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist

rdf:langString Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

rdf:langString Hills v. Gautreaux,

rdf:langString Hills, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development v Gautreaux et al.

rdf:langString Racially discriminatory public housing programs violate the 5th Amendment and Civil Rights Act of 1964, and remedial action to alleviate the effects of such a practice not only is appropriate but also extends beyond city limits to the housing market of the city.

rdf:langString Hills v. Gautreaux

rdf:langString Stewart

rdf:langString Hills v. Gautreaux, 425 U.S. 284 (1976), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court. In this case, a number of Chicago families living in housing projects were awarded Section 8 vouchers allowing them to move to the suburbs in compensation for the housing project's substandard conditions. Carla Anderson Hills was the United States Secretary of Housing and Urban Development; the eponymous lead respondent was Dorothy Gautreaux (1927–1968). The court ruled that the department had violated the Fifth Amendment and the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The significance of the case lies in the sociological conclusions that can be drawn from it. A number of families chose to move, while others stayed, and Northwestern University researchers studying the two populations concluded that low-income women who moved to the suburbs "clearly experienced improved employment and earnings, even though the program provided no job training or placement services." The disparity arguably proves that concentrated poverty is self-perpetuating and simply alleviating this concentration offers an avenue for improving the quality of life of those afflicted by urban poverty.

rdf:langString Marshall

rdf:langString Brennan, White

rdf:langString Stevens