Hamer v. Sidway
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Hamer_v._Sidway
Hamer v. Sidway, 124 N.Y. 538, 27 N.E. 256 (N.Y. 1891), was a noted decision by the New York Court of Appeals (the highest court in the state), New York, United States. Hamer v. Sidway is an important case in American contract law which established that forbearance of legal rights (voluntarily abstaining from one's legal rights) on promises of future benefit made by other parties can constitute valid consideration (the element of exchange generally needed to establish a contract's enforceability in common law systems), and, in addition, that unilateral contracts (those that benefit only one party) were valid under New York law.
rdf:langString
해머 대 시드웨이 사건(124 N.Y. 538, 27 N.E. 256 (N.Y. 1891))은 미국의 유명 판례로 계약법에서 중요하게 다루어진다.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Hamer v. Sidway
rdf:langString
해머 대 시드웨이 사건
xsd:integer
10199944
xsd:integer
1110007227
rdf:langString
unanimous
xsd:gMonthDay
--07-01
xsd:gMonthDay
--02-24
xsd:integer
1891
xsd:integer
124
xsd:gMonthDay
--04-14
xsd:integer
1891
rdf:langString
Louisa W. Hamer, Appellant, v. Franklin Sidway, as Executor, etc., Respondent.
rdf:langString
Respondent's forbearance of legal rights on the promises of future benefit made by Petitioner could constitute valid consideration.
rdf:langString
Hamer v. Sidway
rdf:langString
Hamer v. Sidway, 124 N.Y. 538, 27 N.E. 256 (N.Y. 1891), was a noted decision by the New York Court of Appeals (the highest court in the state), New York, United States. Hamer v. Sidway is an important case in American contract law which established that forbearance of legal rights (voluntarily abstaining from one's legal rights) on promises of future benefit made by other parties can constitute valid consideration (the element of exchange generally needed to establish a contract's enforceability in common law systems), and, in addition, that unilateral contracts (those that benefit only one party) were valid under New York law.
rdf:langString
해머 대 시드웨이 사건(124 N.Y. 538, 27 N.E. 256 (N.Y. 1891))은 미국의 유명 판례로 계약법에서 중요하게 다루어진다.
rdf:langString
Charles Andrews, Robert Earl, Francis M. Finch, John Clinton Gray, Albert Haight, Stewart F. Hancock, Jr., Alton Parker, J., Rufus Wheeler Peckham, Jr.
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
6559
