Gundy v. United States
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Gundy_v._United_States an entity of type: Thing
Gundy v. United States, No. 17-6086, 588 U.S. ___ (2019), was a United States Supreme Court case that held that 42 U.S.C. § 16913(d), part of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act ("SORNA"), does not violate the nondelegation doctrine. The section of the SORNA allows the Attorney General to "specify the applicability" of the mandatory registration requirements of "sex offenders convicted before the enactment of [SORNA]". Precedent is that it is only constitutional for Congress to delegate legislative power to the executive branch if it provides an "intelligible principle" as guidance. The outcome of the case could have greatly influenced the broad delegations of power Congress has made to the federal executive branch, but it did not.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Gundy v. United States
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Herman Avery Gundy, Petitioner v. United States
xsd:integer
60650031
xsd:integer
1082894089
rdf:langString
Gorsuch
xsd:integer
17
rdf:langString
Roberts, Thomas
<second>
172800.0
<second>
25920.0
rdf:langString
___
xsd:integer
588
xsd:gMonthDay
--10-02
xsd:integer
2018
rdf:langString
Gundy v. United States, No. 17-6086, 588 U.S. ___
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-20
xsd:integer
2019
rdf:langString
Herman Avery Gundy, Petitioner v. United States
rdf:langString
SORNA's delegation of authority to the Attorney General does not violate the nondelegation doctrine. Judgement of the Second Circuit affirmed.
rdf:langString
Gundy v. United States
rdf:langString
Supreme Court
rdf:langString
Gundy v. United States, No. 17-6086, 588 U.S. ___ (2019), was a United States Supreme Court case that held that 42 U.S.C. § 16913(d), part of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act ("SORNA"), does not violate the nondelegation doctrine. The section of the SORNA allows the Attorney General to "specify the applicability" of the mandatory registration requirements of "sex offenders convicted before the enactment of [SORNA]". Precedent is that it is only constitutional for Congress to delegate legislative power to the executive branch if it provides an "intelligible principle" as guidance. The outcome of the case could have greatly influenced the broad delegations of power Congress has made to the federal executive branch, but it did not.
rdf:langString
Alito
rdf:langString
Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor
rdf:langString
Kavanaugh
rdf:langString
Kagan
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
13841