Granholm v. Heald
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Granholm_v._Heald an entity of type: Thing
Granholm v. Heald, 544 U.S. 460 (2005), was a court case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in a 5–4 decision that ruled that laws in New York and Michigan that permitted in-state wineries to ship wine directly to consumers but prohibited out-of-state wineries from doing the same were unconstitutional. The case was unusual because the arguments centered on the rarely-invoked Twenty-First Amendment to the Constitution, ratified in 1933, which ended Prohibition in the United States.
rdf:langString
그란홀름 대 힐드 사건(Granholm v. Heald)은 미국 연방대법원의 유명 판례이다. 미시간주와 뉴욕주는 주의 포도주제조자들이 소비자들에게 직접 포도주를 공급할 수 있도록 하였으나 타주 제조자는 이를 제한하였다. 그래서 헌법 내재적 통상조항위반으로 소를 제기하였다.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Granholm v. Heald
rdf:langString
그란홀름 대 힐드 사건
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Jennifer M. Granholm, Governor of Michigan, et al., Petitioners v. Eleanor Heald, et al.; Michigan Beer & Wine Wholesalers Association, Petitioner v. Eleanor Heald, et al.; Juanita Swedenburg, et al., Petitioners v. Edward D. Kelly, Chairman, New York Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control,State Liquor Authority, et al.
xsd:integer
1921596
xsd:integer
1110784192
rdf:langString
Thomas
rdf:langString
Stevens
rdf:langString
O'Connor
rdf:langString
Rehnquist, Stevens, O'Connor
rdf:langString
Scalia, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
<second>
172800.0
<second>
25920.0
xsd:integer
460
xsd:integer
544
xsd:gMonthDay
--12-07
xsd:integer
2004
xsd:gMonthDay
--05-16
xsd:integer
2005
rdf:langString
Jennifer M. Granholm, Governor of Michigan, et al., Petitioners v. Eleanor Heald, et al.; Michigan Beer & Wine Wholesalers Association, Petitioner v. Eleanor Heald, et al.; Juanita Swedenburg, et al., Petitioners v. Edward D. Kelly, Chairman, New York Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control, State Liquor Authority, et al.
rdf:langString
The 21st Amendment grant of regulatory power to the states over alcoholic beverages does not abrogate the Dormant Commerce Clause. State laws prohibiting direct sales of wine and other alcoholic beverages by out-of-state wineries and other producers and permitting such sales by in-state producers are unconstitutional. Sixth Circuit ruling striking Michigan statute affirmed.
rdf:langString
Granholm v. Heald
rdf:langString
Kennedy
rdf:langString
Granholm v. Heald, 544 U.S. 460 (2005), was a court case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in a 5–4 decision that ruled that laws in New York and Michigan that permitted in-state wineries to ship wine directly to consumers but prohibited out-of-state wineries from doing the same were unconstitutional. The case was unusual because the arguments centered on the rarely-invoked Twenty-First Amendment to the Constitution, ratified in 1933, which ended Prohibition in the United States.
rdf:langString
그란홀름 대 힐드 사건(Granholm v. Heald)은 미국 연방대법원의 유명 판례이다. 미시간주와 뉴욕주는 주의 포도주제조자들이 소비자들에게 직접 포도주를 공급할 수 있도록 하였으나 타주 제조자는 이를 제한하였다. 그래서 헌법 내재적 통상조항위반으로 소를 제기하였다.
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
9710