Glidden Co. v. Zdanok

http://dbpedia.org/resource/Glidden_Co._v._Zdanok an entity of type: Thing

Glidden Co. v. Zdanok (consolidated with Lurk v. United States), 370 U.S. 530 (1962), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that judges of the Court of Claims and the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals were judges created under Article III of the Constitution (also known as Article III judges). As such, it was permissible for the Chief Justice of the United States under 28 U.S.C. § 293(a) to designate judges from the Court of Claims and the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals to serve on district courts and courts of appeals. rdf:langString
rdf:langString Glidden Co. v. Zdanok
rdf:langString
rdf:langString Glidden Company v. Olga Zdanok, John Zacharczyk, Mary A. Hackett, Quitman Williams, and Marcelle Kreischer; Durkee Famous Foods Division, a Foreign Corporation and Benny Lurk v. United States
xsd:integer 25582326
xsd:integer 1116547838
rdf:langString Rehearing denied, .
rdf:langString Douglas
rdf:langString Black
<second> 172800.0
<second> 17280.0
xsd:integer 530
xsd:integer 370
xsd:gMonthDay --02-21
xsd:integer 1962
rdf:langString Glidden Co. v. Zdanok,
xsd:gMonthDay --06-25
xsd:integer 1962
rdf:langString Glidden Company v. Olga Zdanok, John Zacharczyk, Mary A. Hackett, Quitman Williams, and Marcelle Kreischer; Durkee Famous Foods Division, a Foreign Corporation and Benny Lurk v. United States
rdf:langString The Court of Claims and the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals are courts created under Article III of the Constitution and their judges are constitutionally protected in tenure and compensation, the designation of judges from those courts to sit on Courts of Appeals and United States District Courts was valid and judgments of the Court of Appeals and District Court were not vitiated by respective participation of such judges.
rdf:langString Glidden Co. v. Zdanok
rdf:langString Glidden Co. v. Zdanok (consolidated with Lurk v. United States), 370 U.S. 530 (1962), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that judges of the Court of Claims and the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals were judges created under Article III of the Constitution (also known as Article III judges). As such, it was permissible for the Chief Justice of the United States under 28 U.S.C. § 293(a) to designate judges from the Court of Claims and the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals to serve on district courts and courts of appeals.
xsd:integer 26
rdf:langString Clark
rdf:langString Warren
rdf:langString Brennan, Stewart
rdf:langString Frankfurter and White
rdf:langString Harlan
xsd:nonNegativeInteger 12401

data from the linked data cloud