Foucha v. Louisiana
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Foucha_v._Louisiana an entity of type: Thing
Foucha v. Louisiana, 504 U.S. 71 (1992), was a U.S. Supreme Court case in which the court addressed the criteria for the continued commitment of an individual who had been found not guilty by reason of insanity. The individual remained involuntarily confined on the justification that he was potentially dangerous even though he no longer suffered from the mental illness that served as a basis for his original commitment.
rdf:langString
Foucha v. Louisiana est un arrêt de principe de la Cour suprême des États-Unis en droit psychiatrique. Dans cette affaire, la Cour suprême a jugé qu'une personne qui a été acquittée seulement pour cause d'aliénation mentale, et qui n'a plus de maladie mentale, ne peut pas être gardée en établissement de santé sans son consentement.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Foucha v. Louisiana
rdf:langString
Foucha v. Louisiana
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Terry Foucha v. State of Louisiana
xsd:integer
14739775
xsd:integer
1089600041
rdf:langString
Thomas
rdf:langString
Kennedy
xsd:integer
90
rdf:langString
Rehnquist
rdf:langString
Rehnquist, Scalia
rdf:langString
O'Connor, Blackmun, Stevens, Souter
<second>
172800.0
rdf:langString
Petitioner's writ denied in State Court of Appeals, denial affirmed in State Supreme Court
xsd:integer
71
xsd:integer
504
xsd:gMonthDay
--11-04
xsd:integer
1991
rdf:langString
Foucha v. Louisiana, 504 U.S. 71
xsd:gMonthDay
--05-18
xsd:integer
1992
rdf:langString
Terry Foucha v. State of Louisiana
rdf:langString
Potential dangerousness is not a justification to commit a person found not guilty by reason of insanity if no mental illness is present.
rdf:langString
Foucha v. Louisiana
rdf:langString
White
rdf:langString
OneCLE
rdf:langString
Foucha v. Louisiana, 504 U.S. 71 (1992), was a U.S. Supreme Court case in which the court addressed the criteria for the continued commitment of an individual who had been found not guilty by reason of insanity. The individual remained involuntarily confined on the justification that he was potentially dangerous even though he no longer suffered from the mental illness that served as a basis for his original commitment.
rdf:langString
Foucha v. Louisiana est un arrêt de principe de la Cour suprême des États-Unis en droit psychiatrique. Dans cette affaire, la Cour suprême a jugé qu'une personne qui a été acquittée seulement pour cause d'aliénation mentale, et qui n'a plus de maladie mentale, ne peut pas être gardée en établissement de santé sans son consentement.
rdf:langString
O'Connor
rdf:langString
Blackmun, Stevens, Souter
rdf:langString
White
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
10303