Federalist No. 43

http://dbpedia.org/resource/Federalist_No._43 an entity of type: Thing

Federalist No. 43 is an essay by James Madison, the forty-third of The Federalist Papers. It was published on January 23, 1788, under the pseudonym Publius, the name under which all The Federalist papers were published. This paper continues a theme begun by Madison in Federalist No. 42. It is titled "The Same Subject Continued: The Powers Conferred by the Constitution Further Considered". It also deals with the Treason Clause of the U.S. Constitution. rdf:langString
rdf:langString Federalist No. 43
rdf:langString Federalist No. 43
rdf:langString Federalist No. 43
xsd:string New York Packet
xsd:integer 2653561
xsd:integer 1108592513
rdf:langString yes
rdf:langString James Madison, author of Federalist No. 43
xsd:integer 200
rdf:langString no
rdf:langString English
rdf:langString Newspaper
xsd:date 1788-01-23
rdf:langString New York Packet
rdf:langString The Federalist
rdf:langString Federalist No. 43 is an essay by James Madison, the forty-third of The Federalist Papers. It was published on January 23, 1788, under the pseudonym Publius, the name under which all The Federalist papers were published. This paper continues a theme begun by Madison in Federalist No. 42. It is titled "The Same Subject Continued: The Powers Conferred by the Constitution Further Considered". The paper contains the only reference to the Copyright Clause in The Federalist Papers. In the brief discussion of the Clause, Madison states that "the utility of this power will scarcely be questioned." He also notes the Framer's intent for the federal government to have exclusive jurisdiction over patent and copyright law. Despite its perfunctory discussion of the Clause, the Paper remains one of the few sources describing the rationales and motivations for the language and intent of the Clause. The essay also references a desire that the national government be given exclusive jurisdiction over a new national capital and provides the rationale for what later became the District Clause of Article I of the U.S. Constitution. The essay references "sufficient inducements of interest to become willing parties to the cession" to be offered by the state ceding land for the federal district to the inhabitants of the ceded territory and that the citizens in the federal district "will have had their voice in the election of the government which is to exercise authority over them." This assertion is often cited in the efforts for DC Home Rule and DC Statehood. It also deals with the Treason Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
xsd:nonNegativeInteger 3379
xsd:date 1788-01-23

data from the linked data cloud