Fallacies of definition
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Fallacies_of_definition an entity of type: WikicatLogicalFallacies
Las definiciones pueden ser erróneas de varias formas. Por conveniencia nos podemos referir a ellas como falacias de definición (por analogía con falacia lógica).
rdf:langString
Fallacies of definition are the various ways in which definitions can fail to explain terms. The phrase is used to suggest an analogy with an informal fallacy. Definitions may fail to have merit, because they: are overly broad, use obscure or ambiguous language, or contain circular reasoning; those are called fallacies of definition. Three major fallacies are: overly broad, overly narrow, and mutually exclusive definitions, a fourth is: incomprehensible definitions, and one of the most common is circular definitions.
rdf:langString
定義謬誤是泛指一系列因定義不當造成的推理問題。
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Falacias de definición
rdf:langString
Fallacies of definition
rdf:langString
定義謬誤
xsd:integer
10632
xsd:integer
1122837540
rdf:langString
October 2017
rdf:langString
Does not explain anything
rdf:langString
Las definiciones pueden ser erróneas de varias formas. Por conveniencia nos podemos referir a ellas como falacias de definición (por analogía con falacia lógica).
rdf:langString
Fallacies of definition are the various ways in which definitions can fail to explain terms. The phrase is used to suggest an analogy with an informal fallacy. Definitions may fail to have merit, because they: are overly broad, use obscure or ambiguous language, or contain circular reasoning; those are called fallacies of definition. Three major fallacies are: overly broad, overly narrow, and mutually exclusive definitions, a fourth is: incomprehensible definitions, and one of the most common is circular definitions.
rdf:langString
定義謬誤是泛指一系列因定義不當造成的推理問題。
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
6822
