Estelle v. Gamble

http://dbpedia.org/resource/Estelle_v._Gamble an entity of type: Thing

Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97 (1976), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States established the standard of what a prisoner must plead in order to claim a violation of Eighth Amendment rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Specifically, the Court held that a prisoner must allege acts or omissions sufficiently harmful to evidence deliberate indifference to serious medical needs. Though the Court credited Gamble's complaint that doctors had failed to provide appropriate care, it held that medical malpractice did not rise to the level of "cruel and unusual punishment" simply because the victim is a prisoner. rdf:langString
rdf:langString Estelle v. Gamble
rdf:langString
rdf:langString Estelle, Corrections Director, et al. v. J. W. Gamble
xsd:integer 11024909
xsd:integer 1031842660
rdf:langString Stevens
rdf:langString Burger, Brennan, Stewart, White, Powell, Rehnquist
<second> 172800.0
xsd:integer 97
xsd:integer 429
xsd:gMonthDay --10-05
xsd:integer 1976
rdf:langString Estelle v. Gamble,
xsd:gMonthDay --11-30
xsd:integer 1976
rdf:langString Estelle, Corrections Director, et al. v. J. W. Gamble
rdf:langString In order to state a cognizable Section 1983 claim for a violation of Eighth Amendment rights, a prisoner must allege acts or omissions sufficiently harmful to evidence deliberate indifference to serious medical needs, and that medical malpractice did not rise to the level of "cruel and unusual punishment" simply because the victim was a prisoner.
rdf:langString Estelle v. Gamble
rdf:langString Marshall
rdf:langString Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97 (1976), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States established the standard of what a prisoner must plead in order to claim a violation of Eighth Amendment rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Specifically, the Court held that a prisoner must allege acts or omissions sufficiently harmful to evidence deliberate indifference to serious medical needs. Though the Court credited Gamble's complaint that doctors had failed to provide appropriate care, it held that medical malpractice did not rise to the level of "cruel and unusual punishment" simply because the victim is a prisoner.
rdf:langString Blackmun
xsd:nonNegativeInteger 6055

data from the linked data cloud