Elgin v. Department of Treasury
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Elgin_v._Department_of_Treasury an entity of type: Thing
Elgin v. Department of Treasury, 567 U.S. 1 (2012), was a United States Supreme Court case where the Court ruled that the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 (CSRA) gives exclusive jurisdiction for claims under the Act to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Additionally, the Court held that the Act bars federal district courts from ruling on matters related to the act including adverse employment actions of the federal departments, and allows the Merit Systems Protection Board to hear constitutional arguments for wrongful employee severance and adverse employment actions. It was a 6–3 decision, with the majority opinion delivered by Justice Clarence Thomas. The case greatly limited the recourse of federal employees to the courts for adverse employment practices, allowing such r
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Elgin v. Department of Treasury
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Michael B. Elgin, et al., Petitioners v. Department of the Treasury, et al.
xsd:integer
36682714
xsd:integer
1067749697
rdf:langString
Alito
rdf:langString
Ginsburg, Kagan
rdf:langString
Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Breyer, Sotomayor
rdf:langString
Civil Service Reform Act of 1978; ;
<second>
172800.0
<second>
25920.0
xsd:integer
1
xsd:integer
567
xsd:gMonthDay
--02-27
xsd:integer
2012
rdf:langString
Elgin v. Department of Treasury,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-11
xsd:integer
2012
rdf:langString
Michael B. Elgin, et al., Petitioners v. Department of the Treasury, et al.
rdf:langString
The CSRA gives exclusive jurisdiction to suits rising under the act to the MSPB, with appeals to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and further appeals to the Supreme Court. Federal District Courts cannot rule on issues regarding the act or on adverse employment actions of the federal departments. The MSPB can hear constitutional arguments for adverse employment actions.
rdf:langString
force
rdf:langString
Elgin v. Department of Treasury
rdf:langString
Thomas
rdf:langString
Supreme Court
rdf:langString
Elgin v. Department of Treasury, 567 U.S. 1 (2012), was a United States Supreme Court case where the Court ruled that the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 (CSRA) gives exclusive jurisdiction for claims under the Act to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Additionally, the Court held that the Act bars federal district courts from ruling on matters related to the act including adverse employment actions of the federal departments, and allows the Merit Systems Protection Board to hear constitutional arguments for wrongful employee severance and adverse employment actions. It was a 6–3 decision, with the majority opinion delivered by Justice Clarence Thomas. The case greatly limited the recourse of federal employees to the courts for adverse employment practices, allowing such recourse only to a few, specific courts as aforementioned.
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
6416