Earl of Oxford's case
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Earl_of_Oxford's_case an entity of type: Abstraction100002137
Earl of Oxford's case (1615) 21 ER 485 is a foundational case for the common law world, that held equity (equitable principle) takes precedence over the common law. The Lord Chancellor held: "The Cause why there is Chancery is, for that Mens Actions are so divers[e] and infinite, that it is impossible to make any general Law which may aptly meet with every particular Act, and not fail in some Circumstances."
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Earl of Oxford's case
rdf:langString
Earl of Oxford’s case
xsd:integer
33353132
xsd:integer
1105292376
rdf:langString
Gargoyle of Benedict Spinola, who Magdalene College, Cambridge believed had cheated them out of their land
xsd:integer
1
rdf:langString
Court of Chancery
rdf:langString
Equity, law
rdf:langString
Earl of Oxford's case (1615) 21 ER 485 is a foundational case for the common law world, that held equity (equitable principle) takes precedence over the common law. The Lord Chancellor held: "The Cause why there is Chancery is, for that Mens Actions are so divers[e] and infinite, that it is impossible to make any general Law which may aptly meet with every particular Act, and not fail in some Circumstances." The judgment stresses that the legal position for chancery (equity) is tempered to dealing with voids (lacunae) in the common law, a principle regularly asserted in the courts of appeal i.e. "equity follows the law", one of the maxims of equity which taken together impose many limits on the eligibility of cases and applicants. The King decreed on the advice of the Attorneys General that if there was a conflict between the common law and equity, equity would prevail. Equity's primacy in England was later enshrined in the Judicature Acts in 1873 and 1875, which also served to fuse the courts of equity and the common law (although emphatically not the systems themselves) into one unified court system.
xsd:integer
1615
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
9937