Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Duplex_Printing_Press_Co._v._Deering an entity of type: Thing
Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering, 254 U.S. 443 (1921), is a United States Supreme Court case which examined the labor provisions of the Clayton Antitrust Act and reaffirmed the prior ruling in Loewe v. Lawlor that a secondary boycott was an illegal restraint on trade. The decision authorized courts to issue injunctions to block this practice, and any other tactics used by labor unions that were deemed unlawful restraints on trade.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Duplex Printing Press Company v. Deering, et al., individually and as business agents of District No. 15 of theInternational Association of Machinists, et al.
xsd:integer
20516359
xsd:integer
1078084504
rdf:langString
Brandeis
rdf:langString
Holmes, Clarke
rdf:langString
White, McKenna, Day, Van Devanter, McReynolds
xsd:integer
41
xsd:integer
443
xsd:integer
254
xsd:gMonthDay
--01-22
xsd:integer
1920
rdf:langString
Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering,
xsd:gMonthDay
--01-03
xsd:integer
1921
rdf:langString
Duplex Printing Press Company v. Deering, et al., individually and as business agents of District No. 15 of the International Association of Machinists, et al.
rdf:langString
The Clayton Act did not insulate labor unions engaged in illegal activities.
rdf:langString
Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering
rdf:langString
Pitney
rdf:langString
Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering, 254 U.S. 443 (1921), is a United States Supreme Court case which examined the labor provisions of the Clayton Antitrust Act and reaffirmed the prior ruling in Loewe v. Lawlor that a secondary boycott was an illegal restraint on trade. The decision authorized courts to issue injunctions to block this practice, and any other tactics used by labor unions that were deemed unlawful restraints on trade.
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
4762