Davenport v. Washington Education Ass'n
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Davenport_v._Washington_Education_Ass'n an entity of type: Thing
Davenport v. Washington Education Association, 551 U.S. 177 (2007), is a ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held that it does not violate the First Amendment for a state to require its public-sector unions to receive affirmative authorization from a non-member before spending that nonmember's agency fees for election-related purposes.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Davenport v. Washington Education Ass'n
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Gary Davenport, et al., Appellant v. Washington Education Association
xsd:integer
16056029
xsd:integer
1100035687
xsd:integer
5
rdf:langString
unanimous ; Stevens, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg
rdf:langString
U.S. Const. amend. I; Washington Fair Campaign Practices Act ยง 760; National Labor Relations Act
<second>
172800.0
rdf:langString
Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Washington
xsd:integer
177
xsd:integer
551
xsd:gMonthDay
--01-10
xsd:integer
2007
rdf:langString
Davenport v. Washington Education Association,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-14
xsd:integer
2007
rdf:langString
Gary Davenport, et al., Appellant v. Washington Education Association
rdf:langString
It does not violate the First Amendment for a State to require that its public-sector unions receive affirmative authorization from a nonmember before spending that nonmember's agency fees for election-related purposes.
rdf:langString
Davenport v. Washington Ed. Assoc.
rdf:langString
Scalia
rdf:langString
Davenport v. Washington Education Association, 551 U.S. 177 (2007), is a ruling by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held that it does not violate the First Amendment for a state to require its public-sector unions to receive affirmative authorization from a non-member before spending that nonmember's agency fees for election-related purposes.
rdf:langString
Breyer
rdf:langString
Roberts, Alito
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
15857