Dart v. Craigslist, Inc.
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Dart_v._Craigslist,_Inc. an entity of type: Abstraction100002137
Thomas Dart, Sheriff of Cook County v. Craigslist, Inc., 665 F. Supp. 2d 961 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 20, 2009), is a decision by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in which the court held that Craigslist, as an Internet service provider, was immune from wrongs committed by their users under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA). Sheriff Thomas Dart had sought to hold Craigslist responsible for allegedly illegal content posted by users in Craigslist's erotic services section, but Section 230(c)(1) of the CDA provides that "no provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider."
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Dart v. Craigslist, Inc.
rdf:langString
Thomas Dart, Sheriff of Cook County v. Craigslist, Inc.
xsd:integer
26450992
xsd:integer
1034639060
<second>
172800.0
rdf:langString
The Court granted Craigslist's motion for judgment on the pleadings, holding that it was immune from liability pursuant to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.
rdf:langString
Thomas Dart, Sheriff of Cook County v. Craigslist, Inc., 665 F. Supp. 2d 961 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 20, 2009), is a decision by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in which the court held that Craigslist, as an Internet service provider, was immune from wrongs committed by their users under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA). Sheriff Thomas Dart had sought to hold Craigslist responsible for allegedly illegal content posted by users in Craigslist's erotic services section, but Section 230(c)(1) of the CDA provides that "no provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider."
xsd:date
2009-10-20
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
9395