DPP v Armstrong
http://dbpedia.org/resource/DPP_v_Armstrong an entity of type: Abstraction100002137
DPP v Armstrong is a decision of the Queen's Bench Division of the English High Court of Justice dealing with incitement when the offence incited could be deemed "impossible" to complete, on the precise facts. It was ruled that this impossibility (and more specifically complete lack of means and/or intention by another person to complete the very specific offence incited) is irrelevant to the incitement itself and therefore a conviction is sustainable.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
DPP v Armstrong
rdf:langString
DPP v Armstrong
xsd:integer
11401740
xsd:integer
1082970218
rdf:langString
None
rdf:langString
Held: to request an illegal item which does not exist in the hands of the intended vendor, but would be a severe offence to sell, amounts to incitement of an offence in the law of England and Wales.
xsd:integer
1999
rdf:langString
High Court of Justice
rdf:langString
Director of Public Prosecutions v Andrew Armstrong
rdf:langString
Lord Justice Tuckey, Mr Justice Moses
rdf:langString
Incitement; impossibility to complete the offence
rdf:langString
DPP v Armstrong is a decision of the Queen's Bench Division of the English High Court of Justice dealing with incitement when the offence incited could be deemed "impossible" to complete, on the precise facts. It was ruled that this impossibility (and more specifically complete lack of means and/or intention by another person to complete the very specific offence incited) is irrelevant to the incitement itself and therefore a conviction is sustainable.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
R v Fitzmaurice 76 Cr App R 17
rdf:langString
R v Quail 4 F & F 1976
xsd:date
1999-11-05
rdf:langString
None
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
5851