Crawford v. Washington
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Crawford_v._Washington an entity of type: Thing
Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision that reformulated the standard for determining when the admission of hearsay statements in criminal cases is permitted under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment. The Court held that prior testimonial statements of witnesses who have since become unavailable may not be admitted without cross-examination.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Crawford v. Washington
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Michael D. Crawford v. Washington
xsd:integer
1346197
xsd:integer
1116718848
rdf:langString
None
rdf:langString
Stevens, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer
<second>
172800.0
<second>
25920.0
xsd:integer
36
xsd:integer
541
xsd:gMonthDay
--11-10
xsd:integer
2003
rdf:langString
Crawford v. Washington,
xsd:gMonthDay
--03-08
xsd:integer
2004
rdf:langString
Michael D. Crawford v. Washington
rdf:langString
The use at trial of out-of-court statements made to police by an unavailable witness violated a criminal defendant's Sixth Amendment right to confront witnesses against him.
rdf:langString
Crawford v. Washington
rdf:langString
Scalia
rdf:langString
Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision that reformulated the standard for determining when the admission of hearsay statements in criminal cases is permitted under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment. The Court held that prior testimonial statements of witnesses who have since become unavailable may not be admitted without cross-examination.
rdf:langString
Rehnquist
rdf:langString
O'Connor
rdf:langString
Ohio v. Roberts
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
13821