Craig v. Boren
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Craig_v._Boren an entity of type: Thing
Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190 (1976), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court ruling that statutory or administrative sex classifications were subject to intermediate scrutiny under the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Craig v. Boren
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Craig et al. v. Boren, Governor of Oklahoma, et al.
xsd:integer
1329951
xsd:integer
1070900327
rdf:langString
Rehearing denied, .
rdf:langString
Burger
rdf:langString
Rehnquist
rdf:langString
White, Marshall, Powell, Stevens
<second>
172800.0
rdf:langString
Dismissed, Walker v. Hall, 399 F. Supp. 1304 , probable jurisdiction noted sub. nom., .
xsd:integer
190
xsd:integer
429
xsd:gMonthDay
--10-05
xsd:integer
1976
rdf:langString
Craig v. Boren,
xsd:gMonthDay
--12-20
xsd:integer
1976
rdf:langString
Craig et al. v. Boren, Governor of Oklahoma, et al.
rdf:langString
To regulate in a sex-discriminatory fashion, the government must demonstrate that its use of sex-based criteria is substantially related to the achievement of important governmental objectives.
rdf:langString
Craig v. Boren
rdf:langString
Brennan
rdf:langString
Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190 (1976), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court ruling that statutory or administrative sex classifications were subject to intermediate scrutiny under the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause.
rdf:langString
Powell
rdf:langString
Stewart
rdf:langString
Stevens
rdf:langString
Blackmun
rdf:langString
Goesaert v. Cleary
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
8124