Craig v. Boren

http://dbpedia.org/resource/Craig_v._Boren an entity of type: Thing

Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190 (1976), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court ruling that statutory or administrative sex classifications were subject to intermediate scrutiny under the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. rdf:langString
rdf:langString Craig v. Boren
rdf:langString
rdf:langString Craig et al. v. Boren, Governor of Oklahoma, et al.
xsd:integer 1329951
xsd:integer 1070900327
rdf:langString Rehearing denied, .
rdf:langString Burger
rdf:langString Rehnquist
rdf:langString White, Marshall, Powell, Stevens
<second> 172800.0
rdf:langString Dismissed, Walker v. Hall, 399 F. Supp. 1304 , probable jurisdiction noted sub. nom., .
xsd:integer 190
xsd:integer 429
xsd:gMonthDay --10-05
xsd:integer 1976
rdf:langString Craig v. Boren,
xsd:gMonthDay --12-20
xsd:integer 1976
rdf:langString Craig et al. v. Boren, Governor of Oklahoma, et al.
rdf:langString To regulate in a sex-discriminatory fashion, the government must demonstrate that its use of sex-based criteria is substantially related to the achievement of important governmental objectives.
rdf:langString Craig v. Boren
rdf:langString Brennan
rdf:langString Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190 (1976), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court ruling that statutory or administrative sex classifications were subject to intermediate scrutiny under the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause.
rdf:langString Powell
rdf:langString Stewart
rdf:langString Stevens
rdf:langString Blackmun
rdf:langString Goesaert v. Cleary
xsd:nonNegativeInteger 8124

data from the linked data cloud