Connally v. General Construction Co.
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Connally_v._General_Construction_Co. an entity of type: Thing
Connally v. General Construction Co., 269 U.S. 385 (1926), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court expanded and established key constructs of the Fourteenth Amendment's due process doctrine along with establishing the vagueness doctrine. It defined necessary requirements that are fundamental to any law, which, when lacking, are to be deemed void. The case was a dispute regarding Oklahoma state statutes, which, in essence vaguely required businesses to pay workers not less than the "current rate of per diem wages in the locality where the work is performed". The ruling determined that the standards set in place were unconstitutionally vague.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Connally v. General Construction Co.
rdf:langString
Connally contro General Construction Co.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Connally, Commissioner, et. al. v. General Construction Company
xsd:integer
47760786
xsd:integer
1053376651
rdf:langString
Van Devanter, McReynolds, Butler
rdf:langString
Taft, Holmes, Stone, Brandeis, Sanford
xsd:integer
46
xsd:integer
385
xsd:integer
269
xsd:integer
1925
rdf:langString
Connally v. General Construction Co.,
xsd:gMonthDay
--01-04
xsd:integer
1926
rdf:langString
Connally, Commissioner, et. al. v. General Construction Company
rdf:langString
The court ruled that the provisions in question were void for unconstitutional vagueness.
rdf:langString
Connally v. General Construction Co.
rdf:langString
Sutherland
rdf:langString
Connally v. General Construction Co., 269 U.S. 385 (1926), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court expanded and established key constructs of the Fourteenth Amendment's due process doctrine along with establishing the vagueness doctrine. It defined necessary requirements that are fundamental to any law, which, when lacking, are to be deemed void. The case was a dispute regarding Oklahoma state statutes, which, in essence vaguely required businesses to pay workers not less than the "current rate of per diem wages in the locality where the work is performed". The ruling determined that the standards set in place were unconstitutionally vague.
xsd:gMonthDay
--11-30
xsd:gMonthDay
--12-01
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
3573