Collins v. Yellen
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Collins_v._Yellen an entity of type: Thing
Collins v. Yellen, 594 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case dealing with the structure of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA). The case follows on the Court's prior ruling in Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which found that the establishing structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), with a single director who could only be removed from office "for cause", violated the separation of powers; the FHFA shares a similar structure as the CFPB. The case extends the legal challenge to the federal takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in 2008.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Collins v. Yellen
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Patrick J. Collins, et al. v. Janet L. Yellen, Secretary of the Treasury, et al.; Janet L. Yellen, Secretary of the Treasury, et al. v. Patrick J. Collins, et al.
xsd:integer
66060205
xsd:integer
1081326789
xsd:integer
19
rdf:langString
Roberts, Thomas, Kavanaugh, Barrett; Breyer, Kagan ; Gorsuch ; Sotomayor
<second>
25920.0
rdf:langString
___
xsd:integer
594
xsd:gMonthDay
--12-09
xsd:integer
2020
rdf:langString
Collins v. Yellen,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-23
xsd:integer
2021
rdf:langString
Patrick J. Collins, et al. v. Janet L. Yellen, Secretary of the Treasury, et al.; Janet L. Yellen, Secretary of the Treasury, et al. v. Patrick J. Collins, et al.
xsd:integer
1
2
rdf:langString
Collins v. Yellen
rdf:langString
Alito
rdf:langString
Supreme Court
rdf:langString
Collins v. Yellen, 594 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case dealing with the structure of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA). The case follows on the Court's prior ruling in Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which found that the establishing structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), with a single director who could only be removed from office "for cause", violated the separation of powers; the FHFA shares a similar structure as the CFPB. The case extends the legal challenge to the federal takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in 2008. In a two-part decision, the Supreme Court ruled that the restriction on removal of the FHFA director by the President was unconstitutional in light of Seila Law, and secondly, dismissed the lawsuit brought against the FHFA by shareholders of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as the takeover of these firms was an established power of the agency under terms of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008.
rdf:langString
Thomas
rdf:langString
Kagan
rdf:langString
Gorsuch
rdf:langString
Sotomayor
rdf:langString
Breyer, Sotomayor
rdf:langString
Breyer
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
12484