Club Resorts Ltd v Van Breda
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Club_Resorts_Ltd_v_Van_Breda an entity of type: SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
Club Resorts Ltd v Van Breda, 2012 SCC 17, is a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada that has brought greater certainty to the question of a real and substantial connection in the assumption of civil jurisdiction by Canadian courts in matters concerning the conflict of laws.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Club Resorts Ltd v Van Breda
xsd:integer
35554652
xsd:integer
1062862197
rdf:langString
Lebel J.
xsd:integer
33692
xsd:integer
2012
rdf:langString
APPEALS from a judgment of the Ontario Court of Appeal , 2010 ONCA 84, affirming a decision of Pattillo J., 2008 CanLII 32309 (ON SC), and affirming a decision of Mulligan J., 2008 CanLII 53834 (ON SC),.
rdf:langString
The court cannot decline to exercise its jurisdiction unless the defendant invokes forum non conveniens. The decision to raise this doctrine rests with the parties, not with the court seized of the claim. If a defendant raises an issue of forum non conveniens, the burden is on him or her to show why the court should decline to exercise its jurisdiction and displace the forum chosen by the plaintiff.
rdf:langString
Club Resorts Ltd v Van Breda, 2012 SCC 17, is a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada that has brought greater certainty to the question of a real and substantial connection in the assumption of civil jurisdiction by Canadian courts in matters concerning the conflict of laws.
rdf:langString
Club Resorts Ltd v Van Breda
rdf:langString
McLachlin C.J.
xsd:date
2012-04-18
xsd:date
2011-03-21
rdf:langString
Binnie and Charron JJ.
rdf:langString
Binnie, LeBel, Deschamps, Fish, Abella, Charron, Rothstein and Cromwell JJ.
rdf:langString
Appeals dismissed.
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
10472