Clousden Hill Free Communist and Co-operative Colony

http://dbpedia.org/resource/Clousden_Hill_Free_Communist_and_Co-operative_Colony an entity of type: Thing

Clousden Hill Free Communist and Co-operative Colony was an anarcho-communist commune from 1895 until 1898 in Forest Hall, Newcastle upon Tyne, England. The commune was part of the back-to-the-land movement, operating a 12-acre farm under collective ownership and democratic control. The colony failed in part because of a lack of capital and internal disagreements and tensions. The nature of the internal tensions and disagreement are to some extent still faced by contemporary intentional communities, such as issues of gender and housework, and the sharing of labour more generally. rdf:langString
rdf:langString Clousden Hill Free Communist and Co-operative Colony
rdf:langString Clousden Hill Free Communist and Co-operative Colony
rdf:langString Clousden Hill Free Communist and Co-operative Colony
xsd:integer 67102665
xsd:integer 1097428323
rdf:langString Depictions of the colony from the Illustrated London News.
xsd:integer 1898
xsd:integer 1895
rdf:langString Franz Kapper
rdf:langString Forest Hall, North Tyneside, England
rdf:langString Rural anarcho-communist commune
rdf:langString Clousden Hill Free Communist and Co-operative Colony was an anarcho-communist commune from 1895 until 1898 in Forest Hall, Newcastle upon Tyne, England. The commune was part of the back-to-the-land movement, operating a 12-acre farm under collective ownership and democratic control. The commune was founded by Franz Kapper and William Key. The founders were in part inspired by the Russian anarchist Peter Kropotkin who in correspondence with the colony expressed his general support, but also stressed his scepticism of small, rural, non-federated, experimental communities. In an 1897 article Italian anarchist Errico Malatesta expressed his support for the colony, but with similar reservations to Kropotkin. Malatesta also raised concern that were reportedly 27 men in the commune, most of whom were young, and only 4 women. The colony failed in part because of a lack of capital and internal disagreements and tensions. The nature of the internal tensions and disagreement are to some extent still faced by contemporary intentional communities, such as issues of gender and housework, and the sharing of labour more generally.
xsd:nonNegativeInteger 6019

data from the linked data cloud