Citizens Insurance Co of Canada v Parsons

http://dbpedia.org/resource/Citizens_Insurance_Co_of_Canada_v_Parsons an entity of type: Abstraction100002137

Citizens Insurance Co of Canada c. Parsons est une importante affaire constitutionnelle canadienne tranchée par le Comité judiciaire du Conseil privé. Il a interprété la clause de propriété et de droits civils de l'article 92(13) de la Loi constitutionnelle de 1867 comme étant interprétée de manière large, pour inclure les contrats liés à l'assurance comme étant de la compétence des gouvernements provinciaux, mais en contrepartie la clause sur le commerce de l'article 91(2) devait être interprété de manière restrictive. rdf:langString
Citizens Insurance Co of Canada v Parsons is a major Canadian constitutional case decided by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, at that time the highest court of appeal for the British Empire. The case decided a significant issue of the division of powers between the federal Parliament and the provincial legislatures. The approach taken to provincial power, as advocated by Premier Oliver Mowat of Ontario, began to set the constitutional framework for broad provincial powers and a reduction in the centralist vision of Confederation espoused by Prime Minister John A. Macdonald. rdf:langString
rdf:langString Citizens Insurance Co of Canada v Parsons
rdf:langString Citizens Insurance Co of Canada c. Parsons
rdf:langString Citizens Insurance Co of Canada v Parsons
xsd:integer 3216600
xsd:integer 1082873419
rdf:langString Citizens Insurance was one of the early major cases interpreting the British North America Act, 1867
rdf:langString [1881] UKPC 49, 7 App.Cas. 96
rdf:langString The Citizens Insurance Company of Canada and The Queen Insurance Company v Parsons
rdf:langString Cover page of the British North America Act, 1867, as enacted by the Imperial Parliament
rdf:langString Yes
rdf:langString Constitutional law, division of powers, trade and commerce, property and civil rights, insurance
rdf:langString Citizens Insurance Co of Canada v Parsons is a major Canadian constitutional case decided by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, at that time the highest court of appeal for the British Empire. The case decided a significant issue of the division of powers between the federal Parliament and the provincial legislatures. The approach taken to provincial power, as advocated by Premier Oliver Mowat of Ontario, began to set the constitutional framework for broad provincial powers and a reduction in the centralist vision of Confederation espoused by Prime Minister John A. Macdonald. At issue was the scope of provincial legislative jurisdiction over property and civil rights under s. 92(13) of the British North America Act, 1867 (now the Constitution Act, 1867) compared to the federal power over trade and commerce under s. 91(2). The Judicial Committee held that the provincial power included regulating individual business contracts, in this case insurance contracts, while the federal trade and commerce power related to matters that affected Canada as a whole, but did not extend to regulating particular businesses. Although the point in issue was a matter of insurance law, the constitutional aspect of the decision was far-reaching. The Judicial Committee decision rejected a broad interpretation of the federal trade and commerce power, and established a substantial reading of the provincial property and civil rights power. The case continues to be regularly cited by the Supreme Court of Canada in division of powers cases.
rdf:langString Citizens Insurance Co of Canada c. Parsons est une importante affaire constitutionnelle canadienne tranchée par le Comité judiciaire du Conseil privé. Il a interprété la clause de propriété et de droits civils de l'article 92(13) de la Loi constitutionnelle de 1867 comme étant interprétée de manière large, pour inclure les contrats liés à l'assurance comme étant de la compétence des gouvernements provinciaux, mais en contrepartie la clause sur le commerce de l'article 91(2) devait être interprété de manière restrictive.
xsd:date 1881-11-26
xsd:integer 5
rdf:langString Citizens' and The Queen Insurance Cos. v. Parsons; Western Ins. Co. v. Johnston (1880), 4 SCR 215, 1880 CanLII 6, affirming a decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal
xsd:nonNegativeInteger 18403

data from the linked data cloud