Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Chartbrook_Ltd_v_Persimmon_Homes_Ltd an entity of type: Abstraction100002137
Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd [2009] UKHL 38 is an English contract law case concerning interpretation of contracts. It creates a so-called "red ink" rule, that there is no limit to verbal rearrangement that the court may deploy to give a commercial sensible meaning when construing a contract in its bargaining context. It also, importantly, reaffirmed the rule of English law, that pre-contractual negotiations were ordinarily inadmissible when construing a contract.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd
rdf:langString
Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd
xsd:integer
31454586
xsd:integer
1082945089
rdf:langString
A Persimmon Homes construction sign.
rdf:langString
[2009] UKHL 38, [2009] 1 AC 1101, [2009] 3 WLR 267, [2009] 4 All ER 677, 125 ConLR 1, [2009] 3 EGLR 119, [2010] 1 LRC 639
rdf:langString
House of Lords
rdf:langString
Interpretation
rdf:langString
Chartbrook Ltd v Persimmon Homes Ltd [2009] UKHL 38 is an English contract law case concerning interpretation of contracts. It creates a so-called "red ink" rule, that there is no limit to verbal rearrangement that the court may deploy to give a commercial sensible meaning when construing a contract in its bargaining context. It also, importantly, reaffirmed the rule of English law, that pre-contractual negotiations were ordinarily inadmissible when construing a contract.
rdf:langString
Lord Hope, Lord Hoffmann, Lord Rodger, Lord Walker and Baroness Hale
rdf:langString
[2008] EWCA Civ 183, [2008] 2 All E.R. 387
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
23621