Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co.
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Caperton_v._A.T._Massey_Coal_Co. an entity of type: Thing
Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co., 556 U.S. 868 (2009), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires judges to recuse themselves not only when actual bias has been demonstrated or when the judge has an economic interest in the outcome of the case but also when "extreme facts" create a "probability of bias."
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co.
xsd:integer
23216676
xsd:integer
1110345713
rdf:langString
Roberts
rdf:langString
Scalia
xsd:integer
8
rdf:langString
Scalia, Thomas, Alito
rdf:langString
Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
<second>
172800.0
<second>
17280.0
xsd:integer
868
xsd:integer
556
xsd:gMonthDay
--03-03
xsd:integer
2009
rdf:langString
Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co.,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-08
xsd:integer
2009
rdf:langString
Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co.
rdf:langString
Justice Brent Benjamin’s failure to recuse himself created an unconstitutional “probability of bias.”
rdf:langString
Caperton v. Massey
rdf:langString
Kennedy
rdf:langString
Supreme Court
rdf:langString
Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co., 556 U.S. 868 (2009), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires judges to recuse themselves not only when actual bias has been demonstrated or when the judge has an economic interest in the outcome of the case but also when "extreme facts" create a "probability of bias."
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
17539