Candler v Crane, Christmas & Co

http://dbpedia.org/resource/Candler_v_Crane,_Christmas_&_Co an entity of type: Abstraction100002137

Candler v Crane, Christmas & Co [1951] 2 KB 164 is an English tort law case on negligent misstatement. In the case, Denning LJ delivered a dissenting judgment, arguing that a duty of care arose when making negligent statements. His dissenting judgment was later upheld by the House of Lords in Hedley Byrne v Heller 1963. rdf:langString
rdf:langString Candler v Crane, Christmas & Co
rdf:langString Candler v Crane, Christmas & Co
xsd:integer 20148960
xsd:integer 1082968891
rdf:langString [1951] 2 KB 164; [1951] 1 All ER 426; 36 Digest 17; [1951] 1 TLR 371
rdf:langString Court of Appeal
rdf:langString Lord Justice Cohen, Lord Justice Asquith and Lord Justice Denning
rdf:langString negligent misstatement, duty of care
rdf:langString Candler v Crane, Christmas & Co [1951] 2 KB 164 is an English tort law case on negligent misstatement. In the case, Denning LJ delivered a dissenting judgment, arguing that a duty of care arose when making negligent statements. His dissenting judgment was later upheld by the House of Lords in Hedley Byrne v Heller 1963.
rdf:langString Cohen LJ, Asquith LJ and Denning LJ
xsd:nonNegativeInteger 31997

data from the linked data cloud