Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Burlington_Industries,_Inc._v._Ellerth an entity of type: Thing
Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742 (1998), is a landmark employment law case of the United States Supreme Court holding that employers are liable if supervisors create a hostile work environment for employees. Ellerth also introduced a two-part affirmative defense allowing employers to avoid sex discrimination liability if they follow best practices. Ellerth is often considered alongside Faragher.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth
xsd:integer
47740549
xsd:integer
1073741101
<second>
25920.0
rdf:langString
Thomas
rdf:langString
Scalia
rdf:langString
Rehnquist, Stevens, O'Connor, Souter, Breyer
rdf:langString
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
<second>
172800.0
<second>
25920.0
xsd:integer
742
xsd:integer
524
xsd:gMonthDay
--04-22
xsd:integer
1998
rdf:langString
Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-26
xsd:integer
1998
rdf:langString
Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth
rdf:langString
An employer is subject to vicarious liability to a victimized employee for an actionable hostile environment created by a supervisor with immediate authority over the employee, subject to an affirmative defense when no tangible employment action is taken.
rdf:langString
Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth
rdf:langString
Kennedy
rdf:langString
Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742 (1998), is a landmark employment law case of the United States Supreme Court holding that employers are liable if supervisors create a hostile work environment for employees. Ellerth also introduced a two-part affirmative defense allowing employers to avoid sex discrimination liability if they follow best practices. Ellerth is often considered alongside Faragher.
rdf:langString
Ginsburg
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
7234