Bond v. United States (2011)
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Bond_v._United_States_(2011) an entity of type: Thing
Bond v. United States, 564 U.S. 211 (2011), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that individuals, just like states, may have standing to raise Tenth Amendment challenges to a federal law. The issue arose in the prosecution of an individual under the federal Chemical Weapons Convention Implementation Act for a local assault that used a chemical irritant. The defendant argued, in part, that the application of the law violated the Constitution's federalism limitations on the statutory implementation of treaties by Congress.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Bond v. United States (2011)
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Carol Anne Bond, Petitioner v. United States
xsd:integer
29248308
xsd:integer
1031979073
<second>
25920.0
xsd:integer
9
rdf:langString
unanimous
<second>
172800.0
<second>
25920.0
xsd:integer
211
xsd:integer
564
xsd:gMonthDay
--02-22
xsd:integer
2011
rdf:langString
Bond v. United States,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-16
xsd:integer
2011
rdf:langString
Carol Anne Bond, Petitioner v. United States
rdf:langString
Bond v. United States
rdf:langString
Kennedy
rdf:langString
Bond v. United States, 564 U.S. 211 (2011), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that individuals, just like states, may have standing to raise Tenth Amendment challenges to a federal law. The issue arose in the prosecution of an individual under the federal Chemical Weapons Convention Implementation Act for a local assault that used a chemical irritant. The defendant argued, in part, that the application of the law violated the Constitution's federalism limitations on the statutory implementation of treaties by Congress. Having decided the defendant could bring the constitutional challenge, the Court remanded the case without deciding the merits of the claims.
rdf:langString
Ginsburg
rdf:langString
Breyer
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
7766