Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Bivens_v._Six_Unknown_Named_Agents an entity of type: Thing
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), was a case in which the US Supreme Court ruled that an implied cause of action existed for an individual whose Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizures had been violated by the Federal Bureau of Narcotics. The victim of such a deprivation could sue for the violation of the Fourth Amendment itself despite the lack of any federal statute authorizing such a suit. The existence of a remedy for the violation was implied by the importance of the right violated.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Webster Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics
xsd:integer
1754621
xsd:integer
1095945181
<second>
17280.0
rdf:langString
Black
rdf:langString
Burger
rdf:langString
Blackmun
xsd:integer
15
17
19
21
rdf:langString
Douglas, Stewart, White, Marshall
<second>
172800.0
<second>
17280.0
xsd:integer
388
xsd:integer
403
xsd:gMonthDay
--01-12
xsd:integer
1971
rdf:langString
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents,
xsd:integer
2017
2020
2021
2022
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-21
xsd:integer
1971
rdf:langString
Webster Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics
rdf:langString
Individuals have an implied cause of action against federal government officials who have violated their constitutional rights. Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed and remanded.
rdf:langString
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents
rdf:langString
Brennan
xsd:integer
582
589
592
596
rdf:langString
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), was a case in which the US Supreme Court ruled that an implied cause of action existed for an individual whose Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizures had been violated by the Federal Bureau of Narcotics. The victim of such a deprivation could sue for the violation of the Fourth Amendment itself despite the lack of any federal statute authorizing such a suit. The existence of a remedy for the violation was implied by the importance of the right violated. The case has been subsequently interpreted to create a cause of action against the federal government similar to the one in 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 against the states.
rdf:langString
Harlan
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
14114