Bilski v. Kappos
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Bilski_v._Kappos an entity of type: Thing
Bilski v. Kappos, 561 U.S. 593 (2010), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States holding that the machine-or-transformation test is not the sole test for determining the patent eligibility of a process, but rather "a useful and important clue, an investigative tool, for determining whether some claimed inventions are processes under § 101." In so doing, the Supreme Court affirmed the rejection of an application for a patent on a method of hedging losses in one segment of the energy industry by making investments in other segments of that industry, on the basis that the abstract investment strategy set forth in the application was not patentable subject matter.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Bilski v. Kappos
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Bernard L. Bilski and Rand A. Warsaw v. David J. Kappos, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, Patent and Trademark Office
xsd:integer
24581131
xsd:integer
1091070161
xsd:integer
8
rdf:langString
Roberts, Thomas, Alito; Scalia
<second>
172800.0
<second>
25920.0
xsd:integer
593
xsd:integer
561
xsd:gMonthDay
--11-09
xsd:integer
2009
rdf:langString
Bilski v. Kappos,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-28
xsd:integer
2010
rdf:langString
Michael
rdf:langString
Mark A.
rdf:langString
R. Polk
rdf:langString
Ted M.
rdf:langString
Bernard L. Bilski and Rand A. Warsaw v. David J. Kappos, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, Patent and Trademark Office
rdf:langString
The machine-or-transformation test is not the sole test for determining the patent eligibility of a process, but rather a useful tool. Bilski's application, seeking a patent on a method for hedging risk in the commodities market, did not draw to patent eligible subject matter. Affirmed.
rdf:langString
Wagner
rdf:langString
Risch
rdf:langString
Lemley
rdf:langString
Sichelman
rdf:langString
Bilski v. Kappos
rdf:langString
Kennedy
rdf:langString
Supreme Court
xsd:integer
1315
rdf:langString
Life After Bilski
xsd:integer
63
xsd:integer
2011
rdf:langString
Bilski v. Kappos, 561 U.S. 593 (2010), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States holding that the machine-or-transformation test is not the sole test for determining the patent eligibility of a process, but rather "a useful and important clue, an investigative tool, for determining whether some claimed inventions are processes under § 101." In so doing, the Supreme Court affirmed the rejection of an application for a patent on a method of hedging losses in one segment of the energy industry by making investments in other segments of that industry, on the basis that the abstract investment strategy set forth in the application was not patentable subject matter.
rdf:langString
Stevens
rdf:langString
Breyer
rdf:langString
Scalia
rdf:langString
Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor
rdf:langString
Stan. L. Rev.
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
13144