Bennis v. Michigan

http://dbpedia.org/resource/Bennis_v._Michigan an entity of type: Thing

Bennis v. Michigan, 516 U.S. 442 (1996), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that the innocent owner defense is not constitutionally mandated by Fourteenth Amendment Due Process in cases of civil forfeiture. rdf:langString
rdf:langString Bennis v. Michigan
rdf:langString
rdf:langString Tina B. Bennis v. Michigan
xsd:integer 18492986
xsd:integer 1080626116
rdf:langString Stevens
rdf:langString Kennedy
rdf:langString Souter, Breyer
rdf:langString O'Connor, Scalia, Thomas, Ginsburg
<second> 172800.0
<second> 17280.0
xsd:integer 442
xsd:integer 516
xsd:gMonthDay --11-29
xsd:integer 1995
rdf:langString Bennis v. Michigan,
xsd:gMonthDay --03-04
xsd:integer 1996
rdf:langString Tina B. Bennis v. Michigan
rdf:langString The forfeiture order did not offend the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment or the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.
rdf:langString Bennis v. Michigan
rdf:langString Rehnquist
rdf:langString Bennis v. Michigan, 516 U.S. 442 (1996), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that the innocent owner defense is not constitutionally mandated by Fourteenth Amendment Due Process in cases of civil forfeiture.
rdf:langString Thomas
rdf:langString Ginsburg
xsd:nonNegativeInteger 3982

data from the linked data cloud