Bennis v. Michigan
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Bennis_v._Michigan an entity of type: Thing
Bennis v. Michigan, 516 U.S. 442 (1996), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that the innocent owner defense is not constitutionally mandated by Fourteenth Amendment Due Process in cases of civil forfeiture.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Bennis v. Michigan
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Tina B. Bennis v. Michigan
xsd:integer
18492986
xsd:integer
1080626116
rdf:langString
Stevens
rdf:langString
Kennedy
rdf:langString
Souter, Breyer
rdf:langString
O'Connor, Scalia, Thomas, Ginsburg
<second>
172800.0
<second>
17280.0
xsd:integer
442
xsd:integer
516
xsd:gMonthDay
--11-29
xsd:integer
1995
rdf:langString
Bennis v. Michigan,
xsd:gMonthDay
--03-04
xsd:integer
1996
rdf:langString
Tina B. Bennis v. Michigan
rdf:langString
The forfeiture order did not offend the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment or the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.
rdf:langString
Bennis v. Michigan
rdf:langString
Rehnquist
rdf:langString
Bennis v. Michigan, 516 U.S. 442 (1996), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that the innocent owner defense is not constitutionally mandated by Fourteenth Amendment Due Process in cases of civil forfeiture.
rdf:langString
Thomas
rdf:langString
Ginsburg
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
3982