Bates v. State Bar of Arizona

http://dbpedia.org/resource/Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona an entity of type: Thing

Bates v. State Bar of Arizona, 433 U.S. 350 (1977), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the right of lawyers to advertise their services. In holding that lawyer advertising was commercial speech entitled to protection under the First Amendment (incorporated against the States through the Fourteenth Amendment), the Court upset the tradition against advertising by lawyers, rejecting it as an antiquated rule of etiquette. rdf:langString
rdf:langString Bates v. State Bar of Arizona
rdf:langString
rdf:langString John R. Bates and Van O'Steen v. State Bar of Arizona
xsd:integer 15565456
xsd:integer 1103043074
rdf:langString Rehnquist
rdf:langString Brennan, White, Marshall, Stevens
<second> 172800.0
<second> 17280.0
xsd:integer 350
xsd:integer 433
xsd:gMonthDay --01-18
xsd:integer 1977
rdf:langString Bates v. State Bar of Arizona,
xsd:gMonthDay --06-27
xsd:integer 1977
rdf:langString John R. Bates and Van O'Steen v. State Bar of Arizona
rdf:langString The First Amendment allows lawyers to advertise in a manner that is not misleading to members of the general public.
rdf:langString Bates v. State Bar of Arizona
rdf:langString Blackmun
rdf:langString Bates v. State Bar of Arizona, 433 U.S. 350 (1977), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the right of lawyers to advertise their services. In holding that lawyer advertising was commercial speech entitled to protection under the First Amendment (incorporated against the States through the Fourteenth Amendment), the Court upset the tradition against advertising by lawyers, rejecting it as an antiquated rule of etiquette. The Court emphasized the benefits of the information that flows to consumers through advertising, positing that lawyer advertising would make legal services more accessible to the general public and improve the overall administration of justice. The Court had previously held in Virginia State Pharmacy Board v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council that advertising by pharmacists regarding the price of prescription drugs was commercial speech protected by the First Amendment.
rdf:langString Powell
rdf:langString Burger
rdf:langString Stewart
xsd:nonNegativeInteger 18358

data from the linked data cloud