Banksieaephyllum
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Banksieaephyllum an entity of type: WikicatMiocenePlants
Banksieaephyllum is a plant genus that encompasses organically preserved fossil leaves that can be attributed to the Proteaceae tribe Banksieae, but cannot be attributed to a genus. Before 1950, many fossil leaves were attributed to the genera Banksia and Dryandra. In most cases, leaves with triangular lobes were associated with Dryandra, and leaves with serration were associated with Banksia. In 1950, Isabel Cookson and Suzanne Duigan showed this policy to be flawed, by demonstrating that the leaves of the two genera cannot be reliably distinguished. Since these two genera then comprised tribe Banksieae, Cookson and Duigan erected Banksieaephyllum to contain such leaves.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Banksieaephyllum
xsd:integer
7944906
xsd:integer
1049962843
rdf:langString
Cookson & Duigan
xsd:integer
2
rdf:langString
See text
rdf:langString
Species
rdf:langString
Banksieaephyllum
rdf:langString
Banksieaephyllum is a plant genus that encompasses organically preserved fossil leaves that can be attributed to the Proteaceae tribe Banksieae, but cannot be attributed to a genus. Before 1950, many fossil leaves were attributed to the genera Banksia and Dryandra. In most cases, leaves with triangular lobes were associated with Dryandra, and leaves with serration were associated with Banksia. In 1950, Isabel Cookson and Suzanne Duigan showed this policy to be flawed, by demonstrating that the leaves of the two genera cannot be reliably distinguished. Since these two genera then comprised tribe Banksieae, Cookson and Duigan erected Banksieaephyllum to contain such leaves. Since then, Banksia and Dryandra have been further grouped into subtribe Banksiinae, and another subtribe, Musgraveinae, erected to contain two new genera. Interpretations of Banksieaephyllum are now no longer consistent. Some botanists continue to hold that Banksieaephyllum is for fossil leaves that can be attributed to Banksieae but not to a genus; that is, they include fossils that cannot be excluded from the Musgravinae. Others hold that Cookson and Duigan's intentions were for the genus to hold fossil leaves that are known to be Dryandra or Banksia, but cannot be attributed to either with certainty; thus they now define the genus in terms of Banksiinae rather than Banksieae. Dryandra has now been transferred into Banksia. Although as yet undetermined, the latter interpretation would result in Banksieaephyllum becoming a nomenclatural synonym of Banksia. Fossils ascribed to Banksieaephyllum have been found in sediments dating from the Paleocene to early Miocene (66 to 16 million years ago). In 1998, the most recent synopsis, there were 16 species, including:
* Oligocene, Latrobe Valley, Victoria.
* Latrobe Valley - has long narrow leaves resembling Banksia candolleana or B. formosa.
* - possibly not a member of proteaceae.
* Early Eocene (Deans Marsh and Anglesea, Victoria) and Middle Eocene (Golden Grove); may be more closely related to Musgravea.
* Late Oligocene - Early Miocene, Loy Yang, Victoria.
* Oligocene, Yallourn, Victoria.
*
* Early Oligocene, Lake Cethana, Tasmania. Leaves up to 5.5 cm long and 6 mm wide, resembling Banksia spinulosa in appearance but has some cellular characteristics of Musgravea.
*
*
* Early Oligocene, Lake Cethana, Tasmania.
* Oligocene, Pioneer Tasmania
* Late Paleocene, Cambalong Creek (near Bombala), southern New South Wales.
* - possibly not a member of proteaceae.
* Late Palaeocene, Lake Bungarby, southeastern New South Wales.
* Late Oligocene - Early Miocene, Morwell, Victoria
* However, Carpenter, Jordan & Hill (2016) transferred the species B. incisum and B. cuneatum to the separate genus , while also transferring the species B. acuminatum to the genus Banksia and renaming it . In addition, the authors excluded the species B. attenuatum, B. longifolium, B. pinnatum, B. praefastigatum, B. regularis and B. westdaliense from Banksieae and transferred those species to the separate genus .
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
8096