Baldwin v. G.A.F. Seelig, Inc.
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Baldwin_v._G.A.F._Seelig,_Inc. an entity of type: Thing
Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc., 294 U.S. 511 (1935), was a United States Supreme Court case which held that a state may not regulate intrastate prices by prohibiting the importation of less expensive goods in interstate commerce. It established the principle that one state, in its dealings with another, cannot place itself in economic isolation.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Baldwin v. G.A.F. Seelig, Inc.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Baldwin, Commissioner of Agriculture and Markets, et al. v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.
xsd:integer
31016285
xsd:integer
1091132672
rdf:langString
unanimous
xsd:integer
55
rdf:langString
Appeal from the District of the United States for the Southern District of New York
xsd:integer
511
xsd:integer
294
xsd:integer
1935
rdf:langString
Baldwin v. G.A. F. Seelig, Inc.,
xsd:gMonthDay
--03-04
xsd:integer
1935
rdf:langString
Baldwin, Commissioner of Agriculture and Markets, et al. v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.
rdf:langString
It is a violation of the Commerce Clause for a state to regulate intrastate prices by prohibiting the importation of less expensive goods in interstate commerce.
rdf:langString
Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.
rdf:langString
Cardozo
rdf:langString
Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc., 294 U.S. 511 (1935), was a United States Supreme Court case which held that a state may not regulate intrastate prices by prohibiting the importation of less expensive goods in interstate commerce. It established the principle that one state, in its dealings with another, cannot place itself in economic isolation.
xsd:gMonthDay
--02-11
xsd:integer
12
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
6819