Attorney-General v De Keyser's Royal Hotel Ltd

http://dbpedia.org/resource/Attorney-General_v_De_Keyser's_Royal_Hotel_Ltd

Attorney-General v De Keyser's Royal Hotel Limited is a leading case in UK constitutional law decided by the House of Lords in 1920 which exhaustively considered the principles on which the courts decide whether statute has fettered prerogative power. It decided that the royal prerogative does not entitle the Crown to take possession of a subject's land or buildings for administrative purposes connected with the defence of the realm without paying compensation. It is the authority for the statement that the royal prerogative is placed in abeyance (is not used) when statute law can provide a legal basis for an action. rdf:langString
rdf:langString Attorney-General v De Keyser's Royal Hotel Ltd
rdf:langString Attorney General v De Keyser's Royal Hotel Ltd
xsd:integer 27026880
xsd:integer 1109887452
rdf:langString [1920] AC 508; [1920] UKHL 1
rdf:langString Constitutional, Damages
rdf:langString Attorney-General v De Keyser's Royal Hotel Limited is a leading case in UK constitutional law decided by the House of Lords in 1920 which exhaustively considered the principles on which the courts decide whether statute has fettered prerogative power. It decided that the royal prerogative does not entitle the Crown to take possession of a subject's land or buildings for administrative purposes connected with the defence of the realm without paying compensation. It is the authority for the statement that the royal prerogative is placed in abeyance (is not used) when statute law can provide a legal basis for an action.
xsd:date 1920-05-10
rdf:langString Lord Dunedin
xsd:nonNegativeInteger 10456

data from the linked data cloud