Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Arthur_Andersen_LLP_v._United_States an entity of type: Thing
Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States, 544 U.S. 696 (2005), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously overturned accounting firm Arthur Andersen's conviction of obstruction of justice in the fraudulent activities and subsequent collapse of Enron. The Court found that the jury instructions did not properly portray the law Arthur Andersen was charged with breaking. Even after the conviction was overturned, the damage to Arthur Andersen's reputation was such that it did not return as a viable business.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States
xsd:integer
1942596
xsd:integer
1065768004
rdf:langString
unanimous
xsd:integer
18
<second>
172800.0
<second>
25920.0
xsd:integer
696
xsd:integer
544
xsd:gMonthDay
--04-27
xsd:integer
2005
rdf:langString
Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States,
xsd:gMonthDay
--05-31
xsd:integer
2005
rdf:langString
James
rdf:langString
Ellen S.
rdf:langString
K.R.
rdf:langString
Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States
rdf:langString
The jury instructions failed to convey properly the elements of a "corrup[t] persuas[ion]" conviction under §1512.
rdf:langString
Kelly
rdf:langString
Taylor
rdf:langString
Podgor
rdf:langString
Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States
rdf:langString
Rehnquist
xsd:integer
119
401
509
rdf:langString
The Obstruction of Justice Nexus Requirement after Arthur Andersen and Sarbanes–Oxley
rdf:langString
The Power of an Indictment and the Demise of Arthur Andersen
rdf:langString
The Impact of Criminal Sanctions on Corporate Misconduct
xsd:integer
2
48
93
xsd:integer
2006
2007
2008
rdf:langString
Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States, 544 U.S. 696 (2005), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously overturned accounting firm Arthur Andersen's conviction of obstruction of justice in the fraudulent activities and subsequent collapse of Enron. The Court found that the jury instructions did not properly portray the law Arthur Andersen was charged with breaking. Even after the conviction was overturned, the damage to Arthur Andersen's reputation was such that it did not return as a viable business.
rdf:langString
J. Bus. & Tech. L.
rdf:langString
S. Tex. L. Rev.
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
7021