Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corp.
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Anza_v._Ideal_Steel_Supply_Corp. an entity of type: Thing
Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corporation, 547 U.S. 451 (2006), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court, relying on , held that to establish standing under the civil Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) provision that creates a civil cause of action for any person or entity injured in their business or property by reason of a RICO violation, a plaintiff must demonstrate that he or she was the direct victim of the defendant's RICO violation (e.g., a business may not sue a competitor that may have gained a competitive advantage by not paying taxes). The Court explained that this construction will save district courts from the difficulty of determining an indirect victim's damages caused by attenuated conduct.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corp.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Joseph Anza, et al., Petitioners v. Ideal Steel Supply Corporation
xsd:integer
23451065
xsd:integer
1093176852
xsd:integer
4
rdf:langString
Roberts, Stevens, Scalia, Souter, Ginsburg, Alito; Thomas
xsd:integer
18
<second>
172800.0
rdf:langString
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
xsd:integer
451
xsd:integer
547
xsd:gMonthDay
--03-27
xsd:integer
2006
rdf:langString
Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corporation,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-05
xsd:integer
2006
rdf:langString
Joseph Anza, et al., Petitioners v. Ideal Steel Supply Corporation
rdf:langString
The plaintiff lacks standing because it was not directly injured by the defendant.
rdf:langString
Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corporation
rdf:langString
Kennedy
rdf:langString
Supreme Court
rdf:langString
Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corporation, 547 U.S. 451 (2006), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court, relying on , held that to establish standing under the civil Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) provision that creates a civil cause of action for any person or entity injured in their business or property by reason of a RICO violation, a plaintiff must demonstrate that he or she was the direct victim of the defendant's RICO violation (e.g., a business may not sue a competitor that may have gained a competitive advantage by not paying taxes). The Court explained that this construction will save district courts from the difficulty of determining an indirect victim's damages caused by attenuated conduct.
rdf:langString
Scalia
rdf:langString
Thomas
rdf:langString
Breyer
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
17899