Alleyne v. United States
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Alleyne_v._United_States an entity of type: Thing
Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99 (2013), was a United States Supreme Court case that decided that, in line with Apprendi v. New Jersey (2000), all facts that increase a mandatory minimum sentence must be submitted to and found true by a jury (not merely determined to be true by a judge's discretion). The majority opinion was written by Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Alleyne v. United States
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Allen Ryan Alleyne, Petitioner v. United States
xsd:integer
39793552
xsd:integer
1081028200
rdf:langString
Roberts
rdf:langString
Alito
xsd:integer
11
rdf:langString
Scalia, Kennedy
rdf:langString
Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan ; Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Kagan
<second>
172800.0
rdf:langString
United States v. Alleyne, 457 F. App'x 348
xsd:integer
99
xsd:integer
570
xsd:gMonthDay
--01-14
xsd:integer
2013
rdf:langString
Alleyne v. United States,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-17
xsd:integer
2013
rdf:langString
Allen Ryan Alleyne, Petitioner v. United States
rdf:langString
Because mandatory minimum sentences increase the penalty for a crime, any fact that increases the mandatory minimum is an “element” of the crime that must be submitted to the jury.
rdf:langString
Alleyne v. United States
rdf:langString
Thomas
rdf:langString
Supreme Court
rdf:langString
Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99 (2013), was a United States Supreme Court case that decided that, in line with Apprendi v. New Jersey (2000), all facts that increase a mandatory minimum sentence must be submitted to and found true by a jury (not merely determined to be true by a judge's discretion). The majority opinion was written by Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan.
rdf:langString
Sotomayor
rdf:langString
Breyer
rdf:langString
Ginsburg, Kagan
rdf:langString
Harris v. United States
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
4608